site stats

Reject reviewer comments

WebAug 9, 2024 · You can choose to appeal against the editorial decision. Since reviewer comments are in your favor, you might be able to build a compelling case. However, be aware that most of the time, appeals are not successful and might lead to further waste of time. So, if you are running short of time, it might be better to submit your paper to … WebJul 30, 2024 · The core problem is that I am worried that, after resubmission, the editors might decide "reject" for my paper, based upon the non-sense comments of Reviewer #2. That would be terrible to me. I am considering to write an email to the editor and ask him politely to ignore the unprofessional indications of Reviewer #2, and why.

Eight reasons I rejected your article - Elsevier Connect

WebComments to Editors and Authors. The editor not only uses reviewer comments to help make a decision. They will often refer to them in their decision letter. With this in mind, it’s helpful to editors if you: Number your comments. Are clear about which points are absolutely critical if the paper is given an opportunity for revision. nighty dresses images https://beyondwordswellness.com

How to submit a manuscript Common Rejection Reasons

WebYou can always disagree with a reviewer (to a certain extent, of course, if you want your manuscript to be published). The key is to be polite and to provide a sound argument … WebJan 19, 2024 · The accept/reject decision is made by the editor, based on the recommendations of the referee(s). In this case, the editor felt that the referee's opinion of unsuitability, even without any explanation, was sufficient to reject. Maybe the editor felt that the unsuitability was self-evident upon inspection. WebReason 1: The suggested change would require you to conduct new research. Example reviewer's comment: "Your results are interesting, but I'd like to know what would happen if you had studied the effect on adolescents, in addition to adults." Phrases you can use: "follow-up study," "future research/consideration," "new direction," "outside the ... night years band raleigh

Why does the Editor reject the article based on only one reviewer

Category:Commenting and Reviewing - Microsoft Word for Dissertations

Tags:Reject reviewer comments

Reject reviewer comments

Declining to make changes suggested by reviewers: Some

WebSep 9, 2014 · It is very important to incorporate the peer review comments into your paper, even if it has been rejected. This is because: 1. The peer review comments will help … WebJun 13, 2024 · Reviewer consensus is valuable—only rarely are unanimous assessments overruled—but it is not mandatory. ACs make initial accept/reject recommendations with SACs: Thursday, Aug 26 – Thursday, September 2, 2024. During this period, ACs will be making initial recommendations for each paper.

Reject reviewer comments

Did you know?

WebMost journals give reviewers the option to provide some confidential comments to editors. Often this is where editors will want reviewers to state their recommendation - see the … WebSep 30, 2014 · Related Infographic. 8 Reasons why journals reject manuscripts. Rejection is the norm in scientific publishing. But by…. 7.7k. Such errors can make the peer reviewers …

WebMoreover, an example of cover letter that can go with your response to reviewers' comments is provided. Discover the world's research. 20+ million members; 135+ million publication … Web2 days ago · Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is accusing the premiers of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba of misinterpreting remarks by a federal minister on whether Ottawa might review agreements that give ...

WebMar 30, 2024 · Normally, you will reject all comments – after you address the issue! Use the Next and Previous icons in the Changes Group of the Review Ribbon to move back and forth to the various changes. To accept a change, click on the changed text (or use the arrow to get to the change), and then click the Accept icon in the Changes Group of the Review … WebSep 27, 2013 · In the case where more than one referee has raised the same concern, it’s best to cite “see response to point 2 from Reviewer #1”, for example. Do remember that each reviewer sees all comments and your replies so be equally respectful to all. The DON’Ts: Don’t vent or accuse the reviewers of bias or incompetence.

WebApr 13, 2024 · Some useful steps to consider: Make a list of all the reviewer comments and number them. Categorize the list as follows. requests for clarification of existing text, addition of text to fill a gap in the paper, or additional experimental details. requests to reanalyze, re-express, or reinterpret existing data.

WebSep 11, 2024 · Replied on September 11, 2024. Report abuse. You can choose to display revisions from a specific reviewer, via Review > Show Markup > Specific People, and then accept all revisions shown, by clicking Review > Accept > Accept All Changes Shown. EDIT: Review > Reject > Reject All Changes Shown. Stefan Blom. nighty dress for womenWebA ‘reject’ verdict means that a manuscript is not considered suitable to be published in an academic journal. Out of all editorial decisions, a ‘reject decision’ on a manuscript is the … nsn for optima batteryWebJun 13, 2024 · Reviewer consensus is valuable—only rarely are unanimous assessments overruled—but it is not mandatory. ACs make initial accept/reject recommendations with … nsn for pencilsWebSep 9, 2014 · It is very important to incorporate the peer review comments into your paper, even if it has been rejected. This is because: 1. The peer review comments will help improve your paper. 2. When you submit to another journal, your paper might go to the same referee. night years east coast entertainmentWebIf the editor sent specific instructions for the reviewer report, or a form to fill out as part of the review, you should write your report in the requested format. ... or to reject the paper. … nighty eightWebJan 16, 2024 · Wait for author: asks the author to review the reviewer comments. The PR author should let the reviewers know to re-review the code after the PR author has … nsn for shelf lifeWebComments from ethics reviewers will be considered by the primary reviewers and AC as part of their deliberation. They will also be visible to authors, who will have an opportunity to respond. Ethics reviewers do not have the authority to reject papers, but in extreme cases papers may be rejected by the program chairs on ethical grounds, regardless of scientific … night years