Sfo v kbr supreme court
WebFeb 10, 2024 · The Supreme Court’s findings Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment in a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court which allowed KBR, Inc.’s appeal, with the result that KBR, Inc. will not be required to produce documents held outside the UK that were requested by the SFO pursuant to the July Notice.
Sfo v kbr supreme court
Did you know?
Webincluding Kellogg Brown and Root Ltd (“KBR UK”). The SFO invited this Court to proceed on the basis of the factual position at the date of the Divisional Court hearing on 17 April … WebOct 16, 2024 · The Supreme Court did just that with a unanimous decision in February 2024. It considered the question of whether Parliament intended to confer on the SFO power to compel a foreign company to produce documents held abroad on pain of a criminal penalty in the U.K.
WebFeb 8, 2024 · In a reversal of the decision at the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the status quo that the Serious Fraud Office ("SFO") does not have the power to compel the production of overseas documents from a foreign company under a s.2 (3) notice of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (a so-called Section 2 notice). 1 Instead, applications … WebTake a read of this article I wrote with my Morrison & Foerster LLP colleagues Chiraag Shah, MCIArb, Gareth Rees QC and Pietro Grassi on the recent UK Supreme…
WebMay 27, 2024 · Last week the UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that it was ending its bribery and corruption investigation into Kellogg Brown & Root Limited (“KBR Ltd”), a UK subsidiary of American engineering conglomerate KBR, Inc. WebFeb 10, 2024 · On 5 February 2024, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of SFO v KBR, in which it unanimously held that the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) cannot use its statutory power to ...
WebFeb 10, 2024 · On 5 February 2024, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of SFO v KBR [1], in which it unanimously held that the Serious Fraud Office ( SFO) cannot use its...
WebFeb 17, 2024 · The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal, confirming that the SFO did not possess the power to compel a foreign company to produce documents held … meghan morelli 7\u00264 news traverse city miWebFeb 5, 2024 · KBR US had no fixed place of business in the UK and did not independently carry on business in the UK; it only did so through its UK subsidiaries. SFO seeks … nand mosfetWebOct 13, 2024 · KBR Inc sought judicial review of the notice on the ground that the notice was ultra vires since section 2 (3) did not operate extraterritorially. The High Court dismissed KBR In's claim. KBR Inc appeals to the Supreme Court. n and m supplementWebFeb 11, 2024 · Earlier this week I reviewed the Supreme Court judgment in KBR v SFO [2024] UKSC 2, which held that a notice issued by the SFO’s Director under section 2(3) Criminal Justice Act (CJA) cannot compel a foreign company to produce material held overseas. I suggested that the judgment was limited to its specific facts and that, in … n and m transportWebFeb 10, 2024 · On the 5 February 2024, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of KBR Inc) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office … nand mulchandani birthplaceWebFeb 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court ruled in KBR’s favour, holding that Section 2 (3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987, which gives the SFO the power to issue notices compelling the production of documents, does not confer a unilateral power on the SFO to demand documents from overseas entities under the threat of criminal sanction, and that the … meghan more popular than harryWebThe SFO and KBR: UK Supreme Court limits extraterritorial effect of SFO powers February 2024 Introduction In R (on the application of KBR, Inc) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent) [2024] UKSC 21 the Supreme Court held that the Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) may not compel a foreign company to produce documents held meghan moriarty belmont